<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Fibre 65 speed in Fibre</title>
    <link>https://community.talktalk.co.uk/t5/Fibre/Fibre-65-speed/m-p/2991397#M381574</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;When I run a speed test, the result is 'poor'. &amp;nbsp;I guess it should be possible to do better than this with our package (Fibre 65). &amp;nbsp;If so, can you tell me how I should go about it?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2023 14:17:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>wrgcantab</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-09-23T14:17:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Fibre 65 speed</title>
      <link>https://community.talktalk.co.uk/t5/Fibre/Fibre-65-speed/m-p/2991397#M381574</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;When I run a speed test, the result is 'poor'. &amp;nbsp;I guess it should be possible to do better than this with our package (Fibre 65). &amp;nbsp;If so, can you tell me how I should go about it?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2023 14:17:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.talktalk.co.uk/t5/Fibre/Fibre-65-speed/m-p/2991397#M381574</guid>
      <dc:creator>wrgcantab</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-09-23T14:17:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

